ESD Quest
Unified status surface for the ESD platform — sister .quest domain to tmc.quest. Placeholder today, primary host tomorrow.
ESD Quest is the public unified-status surface for the ESD platform — a sister .quest domain to tmc.quest, sharing the same transparency-as-product pattern. Today it's a status dashboard pulling live version, deploy state, line counts, and activity metrics from the TMC and ESDBooking sister systems; tomorrow it's slated to host esdbooking.us (or its successor) outright. Two three-letter .quest domains carrying the same posture: the production state is the marketing surface.
- PHP
- MariaDB
- Apache
- Ubuntu
ESD Quest is the unified status surface for
the ESD platform — and the sister of tmc.quest.
Two three-letter .quest domains, same posture:
the production state is the marketing surface. Today
the page renders a live status dashboard pulling deploy
version, commit counts, line counts, OS / PHP / DB versions,
and activity rollups from TMC and ESDBooking; tomorrow the
domain is slated to host esdbooking.us (or its successor)
outright, with the status layer rolling underneath.
What the dashboard surfaces
- Per-system header — current version, deploy time, commit + LOC counts, OS / PHP / MariaDB / Apache versions for both TMC and ESDBooking.
- Live activity rollups — users online, active campaigns, total leads in TMC, JN contacts in ESDBooking, refreshed on each page load.
- Status badges — Online / Degraded / Offline at the system level, so the operator and the public see the same truth at the same time.
- Operator deep-links — footer rail to ESD Booking, Docs, Checklists, TMC Admin, E3.
Why two .quest domains?
tmc.quest anchors the messaging side of the ESD
platform; esd.quest anchors the booking and
operations side. Same pattern of leaving a deliberately
public status board where most stacks would put a marketing
splash. The domains are cheap and the posture is
expensive — owning both lets the platform speak for itself
from two sides.
Why ship a placeholder as a portfolio entry?
Because the placeholder is doing real work. It anchors the domain, it surfaces the live state of the systems pointing at it, and it sits in the rotation of "show me what's deployed right now" the operator already trusts. The eventual full host is a content swap, not a rebuild.
Build something like this
Want a tool like this for your shop?
We've shipped this kind of thing before. Twenty-minute intro call, no slides.